The Winning M&A Advisor [Vol. 1, Issue 3]
Welcome to the 3rd issue of the Winning M&A Advisor, the Axial publication that anonymously unpacks data, fees, and terms…
Tags
In 2015, Dane Manufacturing CEO and president Troy Berg and COO Mike Lisle set the audacious goal of growing the company 3x in 3 years, from $10 to $30 million. Read Part 1 and Part 2 before diving into this installment. As a quick recap, in Part 1 we covered how Troy originally got financing to buy Dane, why he brought on a COO for the business, and his audacious goal of 3Xing the business in as many years. In Part 2 we covered why Troy and Mike began using Axial to source an acquisition, and what happened when they found a deal on the platform that checked all their boxes.
Right before Labor Day, Troy and Mike got word from Dantherm. The other buyer had backed out.
Mike and Troy jumped at the second chance â but were also shrewd enough to know that the balance of power had shifted in their favor.
At this point, not only had Dantherm been through two failed closes, but Troy and Mike had also learned that Danthermâs parent company in Denmark was bankrupt. Dantherm was now being managed by a Danish bankruptcy trustee. âThey werenât paying very close attention to the business nor were they investing in growth. They were just focused on getting a buyer. We knew that our leverage was growing. The time for 20 suitors was six months ago,â says Mike.
Dane was able to negotiate a lengthy exclusivity period â one of the rewards of staying in the game â and Mike, Troy, and Daneâs finance team set out to secure financing.
2017 had been a great year for Dane and 2018 was poised to be even better. In November, they signed their largest contract ever for a three-year deal. Even without the Dantherm acquisition, Dane was poised to grow 50-60 percent year over year. But Daneâs long-time bank took one look at the Dantherm deal and said they werenât interested.
âIt was genuinely shocking,â Mike says. The bank had previously helped the company simplify their financial structure and prepare for growth, including redeeming Troyâs motherâs preferred stock, streamlining real estate structure and loans, and converting from a subchapter C to a subchapter S organization. âThey knew we were doing all these things to do a deal, to do multiple deals,â says Mike. âHowever, not only was Dantherm not repeating its 2016 performance, but they were really nosediving. The bank looked at the Dantherm financials and was worried about its impact on Dane. And they said, âNope, not us.ââ
Though Dane had a huge contract spinning up in 2018, âthe bank was only interested in the historical angle,â says Mike. The sheet metal business is inherently capital-intensive. âEach of our machine tools is north of a million dollars. And you have to have a lot of them to be running the volume we are. So, itâs a very high fixed-cost business,â says Mike. âOur bank had concerns about Danthermâs cash flow and how much of Daneâs cash we would have to bring into the company.â
Their hesitation didnât erode Mikeâs confidence in the deal. âIt just depended on your perspective. Iâve spent 15 years in the financial side of organizations. Iâm used to saying âNoâ to deals and being risk-averse. But in this case, I was appalled that the bank couldnât see our vision, the track record we had. It just didnât add up to say no to this deal.â
“I was appalled that the bank couldn’t see our vision.”
Mike emphasizes that he didnât make the decision to keep going lightly. âTroy and his wife Michelle are godparents to my daughter. Iâm the trustee of his estate. The last thing Iâm going to do as a financial manager to my friend is to put his family and livelihood in a high-risk place.â
Troy and Mike set out to find a new bank. They secured some SBA financing, but needed more. âIt was more challenging to find the right deal financing than it had been the right target. When it came to deal sourcing, things were a more binary â it had to meet our criteria. But with financing, we had a lot more people saying, âWell, we couldâŠâ We did our elevator pitch ad nauseum,â says Mike.
Given Danthermâs current state, it quickly became clear that asset-based lenders would be the best fit for the deal. âIn May 2018, on one of our famous Thursday afternoon meetings, we pulled up Axial, ran a search, and found Crestmark Bank,â says Troy. Crestmark was an asset-based lender with a strong presence in Chicago, just a few hours away from Daneâs headquarters.
Mike had also met Scott Frederick, a vice president from Concord, previously at Axialâs Concord event in Chicago, but at time Dane was still planning on using their existing bank for the Dantherm deal. Now, though, they reached out to Scott immediately.
The next day, Friday, Scott drove to Daneâs headquarters and met with Mike and Troy for six hours. âIt was nine hours in the car from Chicago. But I cancelled everything for the next day and drove there because I sensed Troy and Mike needed help and I knew that time was not on anyone’s side in this acquisition. In the current lending environment, time kills deals. I came away from the meeting thoroughly impressed with their vision for the company,” says Scott.
“In the current lending environment, time kills deals.”
Within two weeks, Dane had closed with Crestmark. âIt was lightning speed for a $3 million line of credit facility,â says Troy.
âAt the end of the day you had a motivated team in Dane Manufacturing and a motivated bank in Crestmark, and Axial brought us together,â says Scott.
The financing wasnât the only thing tying up the deal. Because Dantherm was being managed by its bankruptcy trustee in Denmark, Dane kept hitting walls when it came to deal terms. âWe couldnât hold money in escrow or do an earnout, or do an asset purchase. He wasnât a manager staying on or an owner with skin in the game. He needed a clean, quick deal that we could take to his creditors. He couldnât give us the typical reps and warranties that you would normally get if your seller was going to be out for good. Whether that was Danish law or posturing, I still donât know â but he said he couldnât go there,â says Mike.
As the process stretched on, Mike and Troy worried more and more about keeping the trustee on board. âHe was worried about our financing. So, we knew we had to keep him engaged. We proactively shared our financial prospect pipeline on a weekly call. I donât know that many sellers would get that level of engagement with the buyer, but we offered it because we didnât want to lose the company.â Given Daneâs growth and its capital-intensive business model, âwe knew that we couldnât write the biggest check,â says Mike. âWe didnât want someone else with our same vision but without our capital tie-ups to come in and offer more.â
The team at Dantherm had been through a rollercoaster of failed deals over the past few years. Â âOne transaction after another had fallen through for us,â says Rick Schmidt, current chief technology officer at Dantherm (and at the time the companyâs chief operating officer). Â âIt was hard to keep employees motivated. If an employee left it was hard to find a replacement employee. Youâre trying to keep your customer base happy and do all the things you should be doing from a business standpoint to grow and improve, but you have this big distraction looming over your head.â
Mike and Troy were concerned with keeping the Dantherm employees invested in the business. Â âWe knew the longer the deal took, the more depleted and less engaged the team would be,â says Mike. âWe bought a lot of potential; we didnât buy financial performance. We really needed their people to stick with us, so we made visits on site and also invited members of their team to our headquarters in Wisconsin. We really tried hard to get them excited for what was ahead.â
Rick picked up on the cultural similarities between Dane and Dantherm during the deal process. âMikeâs high-energy, Troyâs high-energy, and thatâs very similar to how myself and the other managers here operate. Weâre both companies that have gone through a lot of challenges and grown over the years. Both are the type of place where you pull together when you have to. Thereâs not that, âThatâs not my jobâ mentality. It was clear that Dane was coming in to help us move forward and continue to create a good foundation for the business.â
Troy and Mike had challenged themselves with the 3X goal on July 9, 2015. The Dantherm deal finally closed on June 28, 2018.
âWe made it by a week,â says Troy. âAlmost three years to the day we set that goal, we closed Dantherm giving Dane Manufacturing consolidated annual sales of $32 million â with Dantherm making up the last third of that number.â
“We made it by a week.”
Needless to say, âIt was a great July 4th,â says Troy. âShortly after we received a bottle of champagne from the Axial team. It was awesome, because the deal wouldnât have happened without Axial.â
Says Axial CEO and founder Peter Lehrman, âAs a CEO I know how risky it is to publicly put yourself on the line for a stretch goal like Troy and Mike did with their team at Dane. Itâs easier to set the bar low, but itâs not nearly as gratifying when you clear it. The Axial team was watching this Dane deal from the sidelines, and we were so completely elated when Troy and Mike let us know that theyâd closed it. At Axial, we really live for these moments where we know weâve helped move the needle for one of our members.â
Now that the deal is done, Dane has plenty of work to do to integrate Dantherm and continue to grow both teams. Dane replaced Danthermâs previous president with Greg Kaye, who they connected with through Vistage, and Dane and Kaye have been working together to help Dantherm overcome its financial struggles.
But Troy and Mike have also given themselves permission to celebrate their success. âSometimes you have to take your nose off the grindstone,â says Troy. âYou have to let yourself enjoy the feeling of accomplishing the BHAG and reliving the story. Youâve got to remind yourself that you just went up another level. Three years ago we had 60 people. Now we have 125. As an owner, you have to take time to celebrate and smell the roses, because thereâs always a lot to do. Work never goes away.â He adds, âShawn Achor, who wrote The Happiness Advantage, sums it up best when he says, âOne of the challenges we have in America is we don’t ever slow down long enough to be happy.â We achieve the goal and then immediately move the goalposts.â
The financial goal of 3Xing the company kept Mike and Troy going, and ultimately pushed Dane to the next level. âBut I have to be careful not to define myself around the sales or the money,â says Troy. âThe most important thing is people, and how many people can we bring with it. Iâve always tried to measure my success by jobs. If Iâm making jobs and sustaining jobs and seeing the same people day after day, year after year, then I know Iâve made an impact. Otherwise weâre not doing it right.â